The Flawed Funnel Of Social Media

The Bridge: In a world where the algorithm is king, are young or otherwise vulnerable audiences finding themselves funneled toward hateful content? More and more users are seeing misogynistic, racist, or otherwise disturbing rhetoric in their feeds – which has even led to some disaffected youth becoming radicalized. Social Media Giants seem to be cracking the whip while ignoring the deeper problem. So what can a parent do to raise awareness and social responsibility in the face of such overwhelming forces?

Break Out the Banhammer

The story of Andrew Tate is a strange one, partially because it’s ongoing, and partially because there’s only one side of it being told online anymore.

The controversial figure, known for his impossibly misogynistic internet persona and goofy online “Cash School” (which was apparently designed to bilk impressionable young men out of 50 bucks apiece). He was banned from Twitter back in 2017, before it was cool. Now he’s been deplatformed from Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube – essentially whittling down the places he can speak online to nothing. He’s a persona non grata both on the internet and off – he moved to Romania to take advantage of their lax prosecution laws, according to Tate himself.

While the official bans handed down were for “Violating policies”, it highlights a twofold problem with the centralized world of social media: who gets banned and why, and who is targeted by “hurtful” content in the first place?

Technically, Tate didn’t break any laws in his online rantings. Sure, his cringey attempts at solidifying his role as “King of Toxic Masculinity” were the tasteless rantings of a practiced edgelord. But is this behavior grounds for total erasure from the internet?

Looking for Blame in All the Wrong Places

As long as young people have access to a browser, they will be steered toward questionable content. Just like not every kid that watched Jackass was inspired to start jumping off roofs, not every young man will glom onto the rhetorical preachings of the likes of Andrew Tate. Remember when Catcher in the Rye inspired the murders of John Lennon and Rebecca Schaeffer? A seemingly unrelated piece of fiction in the wrong hands created killers.

The difference is that now, these platforms that are quick to permaban are actually funneling their users toward this “harmful” content, and using the deplatforming tactic as a form of damage control. It’s risky business, especially in the realm of free speech. In America, at least, citizens have the right to express themselves freely and openly as long as there is no direct call for violent action. In Tate’s case, he was banned for being icky and crass.

Tate’s experience against the banhammer is unique, in that he was pretty quickly barred from all online spaces, his reposted videos on other channels were also scrubbed, and it seems that anyone even peripherally involved with him is also under fire. He was effectively nuked from the internet for having a wildly outdated, almost comically hypermasculine approach.

So who’s next? What unpopular opinion will be on the chopping block tomorrow? Who will Twitter ban, or TikTok delete from their platform altogether?

And will these platforms acknowledge their own roles in steering young people in the direction of the opinions they later deem too inappropriate to view? It’s no secret that the algorithm favors controversy – people are likelier to click and watch things that infuriate them. It’s been this way forever. It’s apocryphal, but there’s a hilarious (and telling) exchange in Howard Stern’s Private Parts about the average listener to his show. People who love him tune in for an hour and twenty minutes, and people who hate him listen for almost twice as long.

Rage bait, deliberate controversy, and provocateurism online is not the problem in itself. They’re part of the puzzle, along with responsibility of the platforms to enforce the rules equally. The only real solution for our kids trying to navigate the space is to not do so blindly, without thinking of the big picture. Otherwise we’re all just the Dutch boy with his finger in the dam, holding off a catastrophe until it’s far too late.

the forced path

Related Posts

You may have heard something this week about what appeared to be the crypto apocalypse, (and the millennial founder of a massive cryptocurrency exchange as one of the four horsemen). Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has fled the US following a total meltdown of his platform FTX, and is in custody in the Bahamas. $10 Billion (with a B) in user funds have been wiped from the slate. Whispers of political corruption, money laundering, and worse have been making the rounds on every social media platform. The US government is stepping in, and we are witnessing the dawning of a new age of digital currency. This Enron-level catastrophe might be the canary in the coalmine – or it could signal a radical shift in public awareness and understanding. We’re talking about Decentralization, of course – and this might sound familiar to you. We’ve covered the broad strokes in past issues, and now we see an opportunity to give you a little more context. Before we dive in, there’s a silver lining to this thundercloud: the first-ever member of Gen Z is making his way to congress. This means that the generation that will be most affected by these radical changes is already stepping up to do their part.
Times are changing, both online and off. Nowhere is this more true than in the semi-illicit and ever-changing world of: Drugs. More than half of US states have decriminalized marijuana. A handful of states have passed (or are in the process of passing) legislation to allow ownership and use of magic mushrooms, ibogaine, and other notable psychedelic plants. Some healthcare providers are advocating for MDMA (otherwise known as ecstasy) and ketamine (an animal tranquilizer) in the treatment of post traumatic stress patients. It’s not clear just what percentage of Gen Z and Millennial partakes in recreational drug use. Statistics vary, and can be unreliable. And there are plenty of examples of formerly taboo drugs being used in a therapeutic context, which might expand as time goes by. With the ongoing swing of the pendulum, we are undoubtedly witnessing a monumental shift in attitudes, safety, and legality. …and some of the ways may surprise you.
Elon, Elon, Elon…after what feels like an eternity, Elon Musk’s purchase of social media platform, Twitter, is complete. As promised (dare we say feared), so too came the structural changes that may quite well signal the end of an era. Content moderation reforms, advertiser exits (right behind executive firings), and questions about the company’s ability to sustain itself financially are at the forefront of most news sources this week. Oh…did we mention that you’ll probably be able to buy a “blue-check” verification soon. As a subscription service, of course. We’re sureeeeee spending money on a previously free (and exclusive) feature is exactly what’s going to keep users happy. Just kidding – Twitter has seen a steady decline in users for the past couple of years, with their already low Zoomer demographic decreasing even more (not to mention the decline of Twitter in general). Click over to the full article to learn more about the status of this dumpster fire.

The Single BEST (and FREE!) Newsletter You'll Read All Week 🔥🦄